Bill v Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] UKFTT 780 (GRC) (26 September 2023)
The Tribunal found that the Trust was entitled to rely on the relevant exceptions and exemptions under the EIR and FOIA, including legal professional privilege, commercial confidentiality, and protection of personal data. The public interest in maintaining these exceptions outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Some requests were manifestly unreasonable or not valid. The appeals were dismissed and the Commissioner's decisions confirmed.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 780 (GRC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mark Bill; First Respondent: The Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (information Rights) / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Decision on the Papers
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Environmental Information Regulations, Legal Professional Privilege, Commercial Confidentiality, Personal Data, Manifestly Unreasonable Requests, Public Interest Test
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Bill
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (information Rights) / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Decision on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requested information is environmental information under the EIR
- 2 Whether the Trust was entitled to rely on exceptions under the EIR and exemptions under FOIA to withhold information
- 3 Whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the public interest in maintaining the exceptions/exemptions
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Trust was entitled to rely on the relevant exceptions and exemptions under the EIR and FOIA, including legal professional privilege, commercial confidentiality, and protection of personal data. The public interest in maintaining these exceptions outweighed the public interest in disclosure. Some requests were manifestly unreasonable or not valid. The appeals were dismissed and the Commissioner's decisions confirmed.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- The decisions made on 15 June 2022, 20 October 2022, 1 November 2022, and 23 November 2022 are confirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment