United Kingdom Judgment

Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited v MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd and Others [2026] CAT 6 (15 January 2026)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal held that the requirements for certification were satisfied, including the existence of common issues and the suitability of the class representative, and therefore granted the collective proceedings order.

Court disposition

collective proceedings order granted

Orders

  • Collective proceedings certified under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998
  • Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited appointed as class representative

02

Material facts

Parties

Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited

Applicant

MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd and Others

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Collective Proceedings / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that the requirements for certification of collective proceedings were met, including commonality of issues and suitability of the class representative.
Respondent
The respondents contended that the claims were not suitable for collective proceedings and challenged the adequacy of the class representative.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 1998, section 47B

    Certification of collective proceedings requires common issues and a suitable class representative.

  2. 02

    Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015

    The Tribunal must be satisfied that collective proceedings are an appropriate means for the fair and efficient resolution of the common issues.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal held that the requirements for certification were satisfied, including the existence of common issues and the suitability of the class representative, and therefore granted the collective proceedings order.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that future developments in the law may affect the approach to certification of collective proceedings.

Court disposition

collective proceedings order granted

  • Collective proceedings certified under section 47B of the Competition Act 1998
  • Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited appointed as class representative

Source and reliance status

Official court record

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Court record

Judgment

[2026] CAT 6

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [

DONATE ] United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal You are here:

BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Competition Appeals Tribunal >> Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited v MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd and Others [2026] CAT 6 (15 January 2026) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2026/6.html Cite as: [2026] Bus LR 487, [2026] WLR(D) 67, [2026] CAT 6 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [View ICLR summary: [2026] WLR(D) 67 ] [Buy ICLR report: [2026] Bus LR 487 ] [ Help ] Mark McLaren Class Representative Limited v MOL (Europe Africa) Ltd and Others [2026] CAT 6 (15 January 2026) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : 6.pdf BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/CAT/2026/6.html

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Merricks v Mastercard [2020] UKSC 51

Case cited

Competition Act 1998 section 47B

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Competition Appeal Tribunal Rules 2015

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.