Miss S Hilton v Marks and Spencer plc (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2021] UKET 1405244/2020 (25 March 2021)

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the employment contract with the claimant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2021] UKET 1405244/2020
Parties: Claimant: Miss S Hilton; Respondent: Marks and Spencer plc
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 25 March 2021
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract

Employment Law Contract Law Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Miss S Hilton

Claimant

Marks and Spencer plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent breached the employment contract with the claimant

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the employment contract with the claimant.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to the claimant for breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.