Ms S Derinyer v Marks and Spencers (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2026] UKET 6001692/2025 (10 March 2026)
The tribunal found that Marks and Spencers failed to adequately consult Ms S Derinyer and did not apply fair selection criteria, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] UKET 6001692/2025
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms S Derinyer; Respondent: Marks and Spencers
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Redundancy Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Ms S Derinyer
Claimant
Marks and Spencers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the redundancy process followed by Marks and Spencers was fair and compliant with statutory requirements
- 2 Whether Ms S Derinyer was unfairly dismissed due to redundancy
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that Marks and Spencers failed to adequately consult Ms S Derinyer and did not apply fair selection criteria, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Court Disposition
claim upheld
Orders
- Marks and Spencers to pay compensation to Ms S Derinyer for unfair dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment