Mr A Adewale v Marks & Spencer (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Public Interest Disclosure : Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2206015/2016 (3 July 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which it could conclude that there was a breach of contract, protected disclosure detriment, or religion or belief discrimination by the respondent.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2206015/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr A Adewale; Respondent: Marks & Spencer
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Public Interest Disclosure, Religion or Belief Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr A Adewale
Claimant
Marks & Spencer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment
- 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal for making a protected disclosure
- 3 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on grounds of religion or belief
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to establish facts from which it could conclude that there was a breach of contract, protected disclosure detriment, or religion or belief discrimination by the respondent.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment