Mr A Irvine v Marshall Motor Group Ltd (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2020] UKET 3303077/2020 (1 September 2020)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Citation: [2020] UKET 3303077/2020
Parties: Claimant: Mr A Irvine; Respondent: Marshall Motor Group Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 01 September 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal Protective Award / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr A Irvine

Claimant

Marshall Motor Group Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Protective Award / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, entitling the claimant to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimant for failure to consult as required by law