Tattersall Tweed Limited v Matthew Butcher (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19188 (07 November 2017)
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 19188
- Parties
- Complainant: Tattersall Tweed Limited; Respondent: Matthew Butcher
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Tattersall Tweed Limited
Complainant
Matthew Butcher
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
- 2 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment