Amcol International Corporation v Max Gattie (Full Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 21034 (09 April 2019)

Amcol International Corporation v Max Gattie (Full Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 21034 (09 April 2019)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2019] DRS 21034
Parties
Complainant: Amcol International Corporation; Respondent: Max Gattie
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amcol International Corporation

Complainant

Max Gattie

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken against the respondent