MJ Abbott Ltd v MAXINE FRAMMINGHAM (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 22371 (14 April 2020)
The complainant established rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2020] DRS 22371
- Parties
- Complainant: MJ Abbott Ltd; Respondent: Maxine Frammingham
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
MJ Abbott Ltd
Complainant
Maxine Frammingham
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
- 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark which is identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the domain name to MJ Abbott Ltd
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment