Mr W Matthaus v MBNA Ltd and Paymaster (1836) T/a E H Carr (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2021] UKET 1601710/2018 (14 October 2021)
The tribunal found that the respondents did not breach the claimant's employment contract based on the evidence presented.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 1601710/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr W Matthaus; Respondent: MBNA Ltd; Respondent: Paymaster (1836) T/a E H Carr
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr W Matthaus
Claimant
MBNA Ltd
Respondent
Paymaster (1836) T/a E H Carr
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents breached the claimant's employment contract
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondents did not breach the claimant's employment contract based on the evidence presented.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment