MCBRAIDA PLC v Revenue & Customs (VAT - ZERO-RATING : Transport) [2019] UKFTT 43 (TC) (22 January 2019)
Supplies of aircraft engine parts qualify for zero-rating under paragraph 2A of Group 8 to Schedule 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 if, at the time of supply, the parts are of a kind ordinarily installed or incorporated in, and are to be installed or incorporated in, the propulsion, navigation, or communication systems, or the general structure of a qualifying aircraft, and sufficient evidence exists to establish this. The Tribunal found that the appellant had sufficient evidence for some supplies but not all, based on customer confirmations, end-use certificates, and documentary evidence.
- Citation
- [2019] UKFTT 43
- Parties
- Appellant: MCBRAIDA PLC; Respondents: THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE & CUSTOMS
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 January 2019
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- VAT Zero Rating, Aircraft Parts, Evidence Requirements, Export Conditions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MCBRAIDA PLC
Appellant
THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE & CUSTOMS
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether supplies of aircraft engine parts qualify for zero-rating under paragraph 2A of Group 8 to Schedule 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994
- 2 Whether sufficient evidence exists to establish the conditions for zero-rating
- 3 Whether the supplied parts were to be installed or incorporated in qualifying aircraft
Ratio Decidendi
Supplies of aircraft engine parts qualify for zero-rating under paragraph 2A of Group 8 to Schedule 8 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 if, at the time of supply, the parts are of a kind ordinarily installed or incorporated in, and are to be installed or incorporated in, the propulsion, navigation, or communication systems, or the general structure of a qualifying aircraft, and sufficient evidence exists to establish this. The Tribunal found that the appellant had sufficient evidence for some supplies but not all, based on customer confirmations, end-use certificates, and documentary evidence.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Zero-rating granted for supplies where sufficient evidence was provided and conditions met under paragraph 2A
- Zero-rating denied for supplies where evidence was insufficient or conditions not met
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment