Mr I Jayachandran v McColls Retail Group plc (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 2403040/2017 (14 August 2017)

Mr I Jayachandran v McColls Retail Group plc (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 2403040/2017 (14 August 2017)

The tribunal determined whether the respondent's actions constituted unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and failure to provide written statements, applying statutory tests and considering the evidence presented.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2403040/2017
Parties
Claimant: Mr I Jayachandran; Respondent: McColls Retail Group plc
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
14 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Written Statements
Employment Law Breach of Contract Disability Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Written Statements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr I Jayachandran

Claimant

McColls Retail Group plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of disability
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal determined whether the respondent's actions constituted unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, breach of contract, unlawful deduction from wages, and failure to provide written statements, applying statutory tests and considering the evidence presented.