Mr S Glover v McColl's Travel Ltd (Scotland : Public Interest Disclosure : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 4104410/2016 (23 February 2017)

Mr S Glover v McColl's Travel Ltd (Scotland : Public Interest Disclosure : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 4104410/2016 (23 February 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, that the redundancy was not genuine, that there was a protected disclosure, that there was an unlawful deduction from wages, that Working Time Regulations were breached, and that written statements were not provided.

Citation
[2017] UKET 4104410/2016
Parties
Claimant: Mr S Glover; Respondent: McColl's Travel Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics
Public Interest Disclosure, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations, Written Statements
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Redundancy Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations Written Statements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr S Glover

Claimant

McColl's Travel Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether there was a public interest disclosure
  3. 3 Whether redundancy was genuine

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, that the redundancy was not genuine, that there was a protected disclosure, that there was an unlawful deduction from wages, that Working Time Regulations were breached, and that written statements were not provided.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

  • Compensation awarded to claimant
  • Respondent ordered to pay outstanding wages