PepsiCo, Inc v Mdhummi (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 13477 (27 December 2013)

PepsiCo, Inc v Mdhummi (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 13477 (27 December 2013)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Citation
[2013] DRS 13477
Parties
Complainant: PepsiCo, Inc; Respondent: Mdhummi
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
27 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
domain name transferred
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

PepsiCo, Inc

Complainant

Mdhummi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

domain name transferred

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.