Medran Developments Ltd v. Haworth [2001] UKEAT 428_01_0305 (3 May 2001)

Medran Developments Ltd v. Haworth [2001] UKEAT 428_01_0305 (3 May 2001)

Permission to appeal is granted because the grounds raise points of law that are reasonably arguable, warranting a full hearing.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 428_01_0305
Parties
Appellant: Medran Developments Ltd; Respondent: Mr Haworth
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
03 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
permission to appeal granted
Legal Topics
Strike Out of Defence, Costs Order, Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Medran Developments Ltd

Appellant

Mr Haworth

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in striking out Medran's answer and counter-claim
  2. 2 Whether Medran should be debarred from defending the proceedings
  3. 3 Whether the costs order against Medran was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

Permission to appeal is granted because the grounds raise points of law that are reasonably arguable, warranting a full hearing.

Court Disposition

permission to appeal granted

Orders

  • Appeal to proceed to full hearing (Category B, one day estimate)
  • Chairman's notes of the hearing to be produced