Megantic Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2013] UKFTT 371 (TC) (25 June 2013)
The amendment concerns the same input tax as the original decision and arises from facts already in issue; Megantic had sufficient notice and opportunity to respond; the interests of fairness and justice require allowing HMRC's application to amend.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] UKFTT 371 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Megantic Services Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Pre Trial Review; Application to Amend Statement of Case
- Outcome
- Application to amend statement of case allowed.
- Legal Topics
- VAT Fraud (mtic), Input Tax Deduction, Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation Periods, Case Management Discretion
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Megantic Services Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Pre Trial Review; Application to Amend Statement of Case
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC should be permitted to amend its statement of case to introduce a new ground for denying input tax deduction under section 26A VATA 1994
- 2 Whether the amendment would cause prejudice to the appellant
- 3 Whether the amendment is within the scope of the original dispute and within limitation
Ratio Decidendi
The amendment concerns the same input tax as the original decision and arises from facts already in issue; Megantic had sufficient notice and opportunity to respond; the interests of fairness and justice require allowing HMRC's application to amend.
Court Disposition
Application to amend statement of case allowed.
Orders
- HMRC permitted to amend its statement of case to include the s 26A VATA 1994 ground.
- Time for applying for permission to appeal reduced to 21 days from the date of release of this decision.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment