Shires (GP) Ltd v Gordon [2007] DRS 4779 (2 October 2007)
The complainant established rights in the trademark 'HIGHCROSS QUARTER' and the domain name is identical. The respondent registered the domain on the same day the new name was announced, requested a seven-figure sum for transfer, and engaged in a pattern of similar registrations. The respondent's claim of prior preparations and use for a wiccan group was not credible. The domain name was found to be an abusive registration and should be transferred to the complainant.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4779
- Parties
- Complainant: Shires (GP) Limited; Respondent: Mel Gordon T/A WEBWORDWIZARDS.COM
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Infringement, Abusive Registration, Passing Off
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shires (GP) Limited
Complainant
Mel Gordon T/A WEBWORDWIZARDS.COM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the trademark 'HIGHCROSS QUARTER' and the domain name is identical. The respondent registered the domain on the same day the new name was announced, requested a seven-figure sum for transfer, and engaged in a pattern of similar registrations. The respondent's claim of prior preparations and use for a wiccan group was not credible. The domain name was found to be an abusive registration and should be transferred to the complainant.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- The domain name <highcrossquarter.co.uk> is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment