Mr N Luhar v Merrill Lynch International (England and Wales : Disability Discrimination) [2025] UKET 6001795/2025 (3 September 2025)

The Tribunal found that Merrill Lynch International failed to make reasonable adjustments for Mr N Luhar's disability, constituting unlawful disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 6001795/2025
Parties: Claimant: Mr N Luhar; Respondent: Merrill Lynch International
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 03 September 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments

Employment Law Equality Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr N Luhar

Claimant

Merrill Lynch International

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether Merrill Lynch International discriminated against Mr N Luhar on the grounds of disability
2 Whether reasonable adjustments were made for the claimant's disability

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Merrill Lynch International failed to make reasonable adjustments for Mr N Luhar's disability, constituting unlawful disability discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Merrill Lynch International to pay compensation to Mr N Luhar for injury to feelings and financial loss
Merrill Lynch International to implement reasonable adjustments for Mr N Luhar's disability

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.