Swinburne & Jackson LLP v Simpson (Redundancy : Fairness) [2013] UKEAT 0551_12_2511 (25 November 2013)
The Tribunal found that the redundancy selection process was unfair and designed to select the Claimant for redundancy, and that the dismissal was not the result of a fair application of fair criteria. The Tribunal provided sufficient reasons and did not misdirect itself in law or impermissibly reassess the employer's scoring.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0551_12_2511
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms C A Simpson; Respondent: Messrs Swinburne & Jackson LLP
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Fairness of Redundancy Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ms C A Simpson
Claimant
Messrs Swinburne & Jackson LLP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the Claimant for redundancy was fair
- 2 Whether the redundancy selection criteria and process were fair and fairly applied
- 3 Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself in law regarding objective and subjective criteria
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the redundancy selection process was unfair and designed to select the Claimant for redundancy, and that the dismissal was not the result of a fair application of fair criteria. The Tribunal provided sufficient reasons and did not misdirect itself in law or impermissibly reassess the employer's scoring.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The Tribunal's judgment of unfair dismissal stands
- No further orders issued
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment