Met Office v. Edgar [2001] UKEAT 1448_00_1406 (14 June 2001)
The Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear complaints of victimisation under Section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 where the detrimental act occurred after the Act came into force, even if the protected disclosure pre-dated the Act, as the statutory tort is not completed until the act of victimisation.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1448_00_1406
- Parties
- Appellant: Met Office; Respondent: Richard Edgar
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Jurisdictional Ruling
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Protected Disclosure, Victimisation, Jurisdiction, Retrospective Effect of Legislation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Met Office
Appellant
Richard Edgar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Jurisdictional Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear a complaint of victimisation based on a protected disclosure made before the relevant legislation came into force
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear complaints of victimisation under Section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 where the detrimental act occurred after the Act came into force, even if the protected disclosure pre-dated the Act, as the statutory tort is not completed until the act of victimisation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Employment Tribunal's jurisdictional ruling affirmed
- Cross appeal not considered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment