Mr G Chauhan v Microspot Ltd: (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Race Discrimination : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2302901/2016 (25 April 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the redundancy process was not fairly applied and there was insufficient evidence to justify the dismissal. However, the tribunal did not find sufficient evidence to support claims of age or race discrimination.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2302901/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr G Chauhan; Respondent: Microspot Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for unfair dismissal upheld; claims for age and race discrimination dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr G Chauhan
Claimant
Microspot Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the dismissal was due to age discrimination
- 3 Whether the dismissal was due to race discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the redundancy process was not fairly applied and there was insufficient evidence to justify the dismissal. However, the tribunal did not find sufficient evidence to support claims of age or race discrimination.
Court Disposition
Claim for unfair dismissal upheld; claims for age and race discrimination dismissed.
Orders
- Respondent to pay compensation for unfair dismissal to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment