Ms R Anghel v Middlesex University (England and Wales : Sex Discrimination) [2020] UKET 3335285/2018 (13 November 2020)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove facts from which the tribunal could conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation, that the respondent had discriminated against her because of her sex.
- Citation
- [2020] UKET 3335285/2018
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms R Anghel; Respondent: Middlesex University
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ms R Anghel
Claimant
Middlesex University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of sex
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove facts from which the tribunal could conclude, in the absence of an adequate explanation, that the respondent had discriminated against her because of her sex.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment