Midland Packaging Ltd v Clark [2005] UKEAT 1146_04_1402 (14 February 2005)
A Notice of Appeal that has commenced electronic transmission to the tribunal before the deadline, even if not fully printed out or received in readable form until after the deadline, is not out of time; the act of transmission beginning before the deadline suffices for timely lodgment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] UKEAT 1146_04_1402
- Parties
- Appellant: Midland Packaging Ltd; Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Registrar's Order / Determination of Timeliness of Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Appeal, Service by Fax, Extension of Time, Notice of Appeal Requirements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Midland Packaging Ltd
Appellant
Unknown (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar's Order / Determination of Timeliness of Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Notice of Appeal faxed before the deadline but completed after is out of time
- 2 Whether partial electronic delivery before the deadline constitutes timely lodgment
Ratio Decidendi
A Notice of Appeal that has commenced electronic transmission to the tribunal before the deadline, even if not fully printed out or received in readable form until after the deadline, is not out of time; the act of transmission beginning before the deadline suffices for timely lodgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Notice of Appeal deemed in time
- No extension of time application necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment