Midshire Decor Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 115 (TC) (01 February 2012)
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late filing as the error was within its control and it failed to promptly address the issue after being notified of the failed filing. However, the tribunal found that HMRC's delay in notifying the appellant of the penalty was unreasonable, and therefore reduced the penalty from £800 to £400 as a just and fair outcome.
- Citation
- [2012] UKFTT 115 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Midshire Décor Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Determination Without a Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Employer's Return, Late Filing Penalty, Reasonable Excuse
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Midshire Décor Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Determination Without a Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late filing of employer's return under s.118(2) TMA
- 2 Whether the penalty imposed should be reduced due to delay in notification by HMRC
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late filing as the error was within its control and it failed to promptly address the issue after being notified of the failed filing. However, the tribunal found that HMRC's delay in notifying the appellant of the penalty was unreasonable, and therefore reduced the penalty from £800 to £400 as a just and fair outcome.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Penalty reduced from £800 to £400
- No reasonable excuse established for late filing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment