VKR Holding A/S v Milen Radumilo (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19290 (04 October 2017)

VKR Holding A/S v Milen Radumilo (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19290 (04 October 2017)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in a relevant mark and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Citation
[2017] DRS 19290
Parties
Complainant: VKR Holding A/S; Respondent: Milen Radumilo
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

VKR Holding A/S

Complainant

Milen Radumilo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in a relevant mark and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • Transfer of the domain name to the complainant