Skyscanner Limited v Milen Radumilo (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21351 (12 June 2019)

Skyscanner Limited v Milen Radumilo (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21351 (12 June 2019)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name 'Skyscanner' and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2019] DRS 21351
Parties
Complainant: Skyscanner Limited; Respondent: Milen Radumilo
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 June 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Skyscanner Limited

Complainant

Milen Radumilo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name 'Skyscanner'

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name 'Skyscanner' and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.