MIND CTI Ltd v Mind CTI (UK) Ltd [2009] DRS 6821 (23 March 2009)

MIND CTI Ltd v Mind CTI (UK) Ltd [2009] DRS 6821 (23 March 2009)

The complainant has shown rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name and that the domain name is an abusive registration. No other factors make a summary decision unconscionable.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2009] DRS 6821
Parties
Complainant: MIND CTI Limited; Respondent: Mind CTI (UK) Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 March 2009
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Abusive Registration, Trademark Rights
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Abusive Registration Trademark Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MIND CTI Limited

Complainant

Mind CTI (UK) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name mindcti.co.uk is an abusive registration

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant has shown rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name and that the domain name is an abusive registration. No other factors make a summary decision unconscionable.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The Domain Name mindcti.co.uk should be transferred to the Complainant