Bowring v Hazelvine Ltd [1998] UKEAT 640_98_0110 (1 October 1998)
There is an arguable point as to whether, having found detriment, it was open to the Employment Tribunal to award nil damages.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 640_98_0110
- Parties
- Applicant: Miss Bowring; Respondent: Mr B
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Matter to proceed to full hearing before the Employment Appeal Tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Harassment, Damages, Detriment
Employment Law Sexual Harassment Damages Detriment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Miss Bowring
Applicant
Mr B
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in awarding no damages after finding sexual harassment and detriment
- 2 Whether nominal damages should have been awarded
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's decision was perverse
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable point as to whether, having found detriment, it was open to the Employment Tribunal to award nil damages.
Court Disposition
Matter to proceed to full hearing before the Employment Appeal Tribunal.
Orders
- Request Chairman's Notes of Evidence relating to the evidence of Miss Bowring and Mr B.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment