Agarwal v Cardiff University & Anor (Contract of Employment: Implied Term/Variation/Construction of Term) [2017] UKEAT 0210_16_2203 (22 March 2017)
The Employment Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the claimant's section 13 claim because resolution requires construction and implication of terms in the contract of employment, which is reserved for the civil courts.
- Citation
- [2017] UKEAT 0210_16_2203
- Parties
- Appellant: Miss M Agarwal; First Respondent: Cardiff University; Second Respondent: Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Unauthorised Deduction From Wages, Jurisdiction of Employment Tribunal, Construction of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss M Agarwal
Appellant
Cardiff University
First Respondent
Cardiff and Vale University Local Health Board
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Employment Tribunal have jurisdiction to determine a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages under ERA section 13 when construction or implication of contractual terms is required?
- 2 Is the claimant entitled to wages for clinical duties after 1 October 2014 under her contract with the First Respondent?
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the claimant's section 13 claim because resolution requires construction and implication of terms in the contract of employment, which is reserved for the civil courts.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment