Moore v Travelsphere Ltd & Ors [1997] UKEAT 738_97_1410 (14 October 1997)

There are arguable points of law regarding the sufficiency of the Tribunal's findings and its approach to the comparative element and statutory requirements in discrimination and victimisation claims, warranting a full hearing.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [1997] UKEAT 738_97_1410
Parties: Appellant: Miss Moore; Respondent: Travelsphere Ltd and certain named individuals
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 14 October 1997
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Outcome: Matter to proceed to full hearing before the Employment Appeal Tribunal.
Legal Topics: Race Discrimination, Constructive Dismissal, Victimisation, Tribunal Procedure

Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Constructive Dismissal Victimisation Tribunal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss Moore

Appellant

Travelsphere Ltd and certain named individuals

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal failed to make sufficient findings on key allegations of discrimination and victimisation
2 Whether the Tribunal properly addressed the comparative element in direct discrimination and victimisation claims
3 Whether the Tribunal had proper regard to statutory requirements regarding Race Relations questionnaires

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Matter to proceed to full hearing before the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Orders

Case classified as Category B fit for hearing before a High Court Judge
Estimate of one day for hearing

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.