Mullally v. Securicor Recruitment Services Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1299_00_2203 (22 March 2001)
The Tribunal found that although mimicry and banter based on racial identity are capable of amounting to discrimination, there was no detriment suffered by the appellant as she initiated and participated in the conduct, and did not raise a complaint with anyone in authority. The Tribunal's findings were not perverse or based on a wrong principle of law, and there was no arguable case for appeal.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1299_00_2203
- Parties
- Appellant: Miss Mullally; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Harassment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Mullally
Appellant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether banter based on racial identity constitutes racial discrimination under the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether the appellant suffered detriment as a result of alleged racial harassment
- 3 Whether the appellant was treated less favourably on grounds of sex or race
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that although mimicry and banter based on racial identity are capable of amounting to discrimination, there was no detriment suffered by the appellant as she initiated and participated in the conduct, and did not raise a complaint with anyone in authority. The Tribunal's findings were not perverse or based on a wrong principle of law, and there was no arguable case for appeal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No full appeal will be heard
- No further action required
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment