Mr T Scrope v Miss S Alexandra (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2017] UKET 3322924/2016 (16 February 2017)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] United Kingdom Employment Tribunal You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Tribunal >> Mr T Scrope v Miss S Alexandra (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2017] UKET 3322924/2016 (16 February...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3322924/2016
Parties: Claimant: Mr T Scrope; Respondent: Miss S Alexandra
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 16 February 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract

Employment Law Contract Law Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Mr T Scrope

Claimant

Miss S Alexandra

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether there was a breach of contract by the respondent

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.