Walton v. Image Creative Ltd & Anor [2003] UKEAT 1471_00_0808 (8 August 2003)
The appeal proceedings were unreasonably pursued after 1 April 2002, as there was no legitimate point of law remaining and the grounds amounted to attempts to re-argue facts already determined. Costs are therefore awarded against Miss Walton under Rule 34.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 1471_00_0808
- Parties
- Appellant: Miss Walton; Respondent: Image Creative Limited; Respondent: Mr Rowan Bayliss
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Costs Application Following Unsuccessful Appeal
- Outcome
- Costs application granted
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeal Procedure, Unreasonable Conduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss Walton
Appellant
Image Creative Limited
Respondent
Mr Rowan Bayliss
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Costs Application Following Unsuccessful Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appeal proceedings were unreasonably pursued after 1 April 2002
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded against the appellant under Rule 34
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal proceedings were unreasonably pursued after 1 April 2002, as there was no legitimate point of law remaining and the grounds amounted to attempts to re-argue facts already determined. Costs are therefore awarded against Miss Walton under Rule 34.
Court Disposition
Costs application granted
Orders
- Miss Walton to pay the Respondents £2,500 for the entire costs of the proceedings from 1 April 2002 onwards.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment