Mitchell v. Egyptian Hotels Ltd [1915] UKHL 496 (09 July 1915)
The House of Lords, being equally divided, affirmed the Court of Appeal's decision that the company's business was carried on wholly abroad after the 1908 resolutions, with no acts of management or participation in business operations in the UK, so only profits remitted to the UK were assessable under Case 5 of Schedule D.
- Citation
- [1915] UKHL 496
- Parties
- Appellant: Mitchell; Respondent: Egyptian Hotels Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 1915
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Court of Appeal (england) / Final Judgment by House of Lords
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal decision affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax on Foreign Profits, Corporate Residency, Assessment Under Income Tax Act 1842, Remittance Basis Taxation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mitchell
Appellant
Egyptian Hotels Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Court of Appeal (england) / Final Judgment by House of Lords
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a UK-resident company is liable to income tax under Case 1 or Case 5 of Schedule D for profits earned abroad and not remitted to the UK
- 2 Whether the business was carried on wholly abroad or partly in the UK for tax purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The House of Lords, being equally divided, affirmed the Court of Appeal's decision that the company's business was carried on wholly abroad after the 1908 resolutions, with no acts of management or participation in business operations in the UK, so only profits remitted to the UK were assessable under Case 5 of Schedule D.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Court of Appeal decision affirmed.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Assessment to income tax limited to profits remitted to the UK.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment