Shakil v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2018] UKFTT 181 (TC) (06 April 2018)
The appellant did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for late filing throughout the default period; misunderstanding or employer error does not constitute reasonable excuse under the law. No special circumstances were found to justify reduction of penalties. Penalties were imposed in accordance with statutory requirements.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 181
- Parties
- Appellant: Mohammad Shakil; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Self Assessment, Penalties, Reasonable Excuse, Special Circumstances
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mohammad Shakil
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late filing of self-assessment tax returns for 2012-13 and 2013-14
- 2 Whether penalties imposed under Schedule 55 Finance Act 2009 should be reduced due to special circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for late filing throughout the default period; misunderstanding or employer error does not constitute reasonable excuse under the law. No special circumstances were found to justify reduction of penalties. Penalties were imposed in accordance with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Late filing penalties confirmed
- No reduction for special circumstances
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment