Sheikh v. ADT (Tyco) Fire and Security (Disability related discrimination - Race Discrimination) [2018] UKEAT 0095_18_2108 (21 August 2018)

Sheikh v. ADT (Tyco) Fire and Security (Disability related discrimination - Race Discrimination) [2018] UKEAT 0095_18_2108 (21 August 2018)

The Tribunal did not err in law in finding no discrimination, as the claimant failed to establish a prima facie case of less favourable treatment due to disability or race, and the Tribunal's findings were supported by evidence. The Tribunal's reasoning was adequate and Meek-compliant.

Citation
[2018] UKEAT 0095_18_2108
Parties
Appellant: Mohammed Naqi Sheikh; Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Promotion Procedures, Appraisal Process
Employment Law Discrimination Law Disability Discrimination Race Discrimination Victimisation Promotion Procedures Appraisal Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammed Naqi Sheikh

Appellant

Unknown (Respondent)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on grounds of disability and race by failing to conduct appraisals and denying promotion opportunities
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law by not addressing the claimant's evidence regarding requests for appraisals
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal's reasoning was Meek-compliant

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not err in law in finding no discrimination, as the claimant failed to establish a prima facie case of less favourable treatment due to disability or race, and the Tribunal's findings were supported by evidence. The Tribunal's reasoning was adequate and Meek-compliant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed