Mr T Abbott & Others v Monarch Airlines Ltd (in Administration) and Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2020] UKET 3326469/2019 (11 February 2020)

Monarch Airlines Ltd failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, entitling claimants to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] UKET 3326469/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr T Abbott & Others; Respondent: Monarch Airlines Ltd (in Administration); Respondent: Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 11 February 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Failure to Consult

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Failure to Consult

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr T Abbott & Others

Claimant

Monarch Airlines Ltd (in Administration)

Respondent

Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether Monarch Airlines Ltd failed to consult employees prior to redundancy as required by law
2 Entitlement of employees to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

Monarch Airlines Ltd failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, entitling claimants to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Protective award granted to claimants
Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy liable for payments

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.