Mr D Wilson v Motorline Ltd and Mr M Phelps (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2021] UKET 2300083/2020 (17 September 2021)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Act and therefore was not entitled to protection from detriment or dismissal on that basis.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 2300083/2020
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr D Wilson; Respondent: Motorline Ltd; Respondent: Mr M Phelps
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr D Wilson
Claimant
Motorline Ltd
Respondent
Mr M Phelps
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure within the meaning of the Act and therefore was not entitled to protection from detriment or dismissal on that basis.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment