Mr T Singh v (1) Mr A Brett (2) Able Data Services Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2301275/2016 (16 May 2017)

Mr T Singh v (1) Mr A Brett (2) Able Data Services Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Religion or Belief Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 2301275/2016 (16 May 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, suffered unlawful deduction from wages, and was discriminated against on grounds of religion or belief. The respondents breached contract and Working Time Regulations.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2301275/2016
Parties
Claimant: Mr T Singh; Respondent: Mr A Brett; Respondent: Able Data Services Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Religion or Belief Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr T Singh

Claimant

Mr A Brett

Respondent

Able Data Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether there was unlawful deduction from wages
  3. 3 Whether there was discrimination on grounds of religion or belief

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed, suffered unlawful deduction from wages, and was discriminated against on grounds of religion or belief. The respondents breached contract and Working Time Regulations.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

  • Respondents to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
  • Respondents to pay compensation for unlawful deduction from wages