Redgrave v. Culham [2001] UKEAT 618_01_0810 (8 October 2001)
The employer failed to provide written reasons for dismissal within 14 days as required by Section 92(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The letter of 14 July did not constitute reasons for a dismissal that had already occurred. The statutory award of two weeks' pay is mandatory under Section 93(2)(b), and there...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 618_01_0810
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr A Culham; Respondent/appellant: Mr D Redgrave t/a Redgrave Services
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Written Reasons for Dismissal, Payment in Lieu of Notice, Gross Misconduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr A Culham
Applicant
Mr D Redgrave t/a Redgrave Services
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer provided written reasons for dismissal within the statutory period under Section 92(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in awarding two weeks' pay under Section 93(2)(b)
- 3 Whether the appeal can proceed in the absence of extended reasons
Ratio Decidendi
The employer failed to provide written reasons for dismissal within 14 days as required by Section 92(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The letter of 14 July did not constitute reasons for a dismissal that had already occurred. The statutory award of two weeks' pay is mandatory under Section 93(2)(b), and there is no discretion to reduce or withhold the award even if the employee knew the reasons for dismissal.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal is dismissed at the preliminary stage
- Respondent to pay Applicant £760.00 forthwith
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment