Boxshall & Ors v PTC & CPSA [1998] UKEAT 24_98_1902 (19 February 1998)
The PTC was in breach of Section 100E(6) by failing to provide members with the report or a summary. The tribunal accepted the undertaking by PTC to send the report and declined to make a further order under Section 103(3)(b). Leave to appeal was refused as the issues were matters of discretion and the law was clear.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 24_98_1902
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr A England; Respondent: PTC; Respondent: CPSA
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- First appeal dismissed; declaration made on second appeal; no further order under Section 103(3)(b); leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Certification Officer, Trade Union Amalgamation, Disclosure of Reports, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr A England
Appellant
PTC
Respondent
CPSA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the PTC breached Section 100E(6) by failing to provide members with a copy or summary of the report
- 2 Whether an order should be made under Section 103(3)(b)
- 3 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The PTC was in breach of Section 100E(6) by failing to provide members with the report or a summary. The tribunal accepted the undertaking by PTC to send the report and declined to make a further order under Section 103(3)(b). Leave to appeal was refused as the issues were matters of discretion and the law was clear.
Court Disposition
First appeal dismissed; declaration made on second appeal; no further order under Section 103(3)(b); leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- First appeal dismissed.
- Declaration that PTC breached Section 100E(6).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment