Mitchell v Barratt Homes (Leeds) Ltd [2009] UKEAT 0903_08_1303 (13 March 2009)
Exceptional reasons for delay were accepted, allowing appeal against Registrar’s refusal to extend time, but the substantive Rule 3(10) application and new evidence failed as there was no error of law and no reasonable prospect of success.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0903_08_1303
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr A G Mitchell; Respondent: Barratts
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Registrar’s Order / Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal against Registrar’s refusal allowed; substantive Rule 3(10) application dismissed; permission to appeal to Court of Appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Whistle Blowing, Protected Disclosure, Adduction of New Evidence, Jurisdiction, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr A G Mitchell
Appellant
Barratts
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar’s Order / Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time should be granted for Rule 3(10) application
- 2 Whether new evidence should be admitted on appeal
- 3 Whether dismissal was for making a protected disclosure under Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
Exceptional reasons for delay were accepted, allowing appeal against Registrar’s refusal to extend time, but the substantive Rule 3(10) application and new evidence failed as there was no error of law and no reasonable prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Appeal against Registrar’s refusal allowed; substantive Rule 3(10) application dismissed; permission to appeal to Court of Appeal refused.
Orders
- Extension of time for Rule 3(10) application granted for exceptional reasons.
- Application to adduce new evidence refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment