Abrahams v Crown Prosecution Service [1993] UKEAT 829_92_0903 (9 March 1993)
The Chairman was justified in refusing the interlocutory application for inspection and particulars, as relevant documentation can be disclosed at the hearing if deemed necessary.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 829_92_0903
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Abrahams; Respondents: Treasury Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Inspection of Documents, Further and Better Particulars, Exercise of Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr Abrahams
Appellant
Treasury Solicitors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Chairman erred in refusing further and better particulars
- 2 Whether the Chairman erred in refusing inspection of documents at the interlocutory stage
Ratio Decidendi
The Chairman was justified in refusing the interlocutory application for inspection and particulars, as relevant documentation can be disclosed at the hearing if deemed necessary.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment