Hollis School Of Dance And Drama v Mr Adam Mersh (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 18018 (15 November 2016)

Hollis School Of Dance And Drama v Mr Adam Mersh (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 18018 (15 November 2016)

The complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy; therefore, no action was taken against the respondent.

Citation
[2016] DRS 18018
Parties
Complainant: Hollis School Of Dance And Drama; Respondent: Mr Adam Mersh
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
No Action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Marks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hollis School Of Dance And Drama

Complainant

Mr Adam Mersh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy; therefore, no action was taken against the respondent.

Court Disposition

No Action