Foot Anstey Sargent -v- Cameron [2002] DRS 160 (3 February 2002)

Foot Anstey Sargent -v- Cameron [2002] DRS 160 (3 February 2002)

The domain name was registered in a manner that took unfair advantage of the complainant's rights, as the name is unique and particular to the complainant, and the respondent had no legitimate connection or fair use. The registration prevents the complainant from using the URL and could be used detrimentally in the future.

Citation
[2002] DRS 160
Parties
Complainant: Foot Anstey Sargent; Respondent: Mr Adrian Cameron
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
03 February 2002
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Registration, Abusive Registration, Trademark Rights
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Registration Abusive Registration Trademark Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Foot Anstey Sargent

Complainant

Mr Adrian Cameron

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
  2. 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration

Ratio Decidendi

The domain name was registered in a manner that took unfair advantage of the complainant's rights, as the name is unique and particular to the complainant, and the respondent had no legitimate connection or fair use. The registration prevents the complainant from using the URL and could be used detrimentally in the future.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • Domain name footansteysargent.co.uk to be transferred to the complainant