Gamestec Leisure Ltd v Stone [2003] UKEAT 809_02_1104 (11 April 2003)
The Tribunal erred in assessing compensation by failing to make findings on the effect of the resignation letter and awarding four weeks' notice pay contrary to contractual terms; case remitted for reassessment of compensation only.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 809_02_1104
- Parties
- Appellant Advocate: Mr Malcolm Davies; Appellant Advocate Firm: Messrs Andersons Solicitors; Respondent: Mr Anthony Stone; Employer Representative: Mr Vaux
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- case remitted to differently constituted Tribunal for compensation assessment only
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Compensation Assessment, Notice Period, Resignation Effect
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Malcolm Davies
Appellant Advocate
Messrs Andersons Solicitors
Appellant Advocate Firm
Mr Anthony Stone
Respondent
Mr Vaux
Employer Representative
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Stone resigned before dismissal and effect on compensation
- 2 Whether Tribunal erred in awarding four weeks' notice pay contrary to contract
- 3 Whether Tribunal considered effect of resignation letter in compensation award
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in assessing compensation by failing to make findings on the effect of the resignation letter and awarding four weeks' notice pay contrary to contractual terms; case remitted for reassessment of compensation only.
Court Disposition
case remitted to differently constituted Tribunal for compensation assessment only
Orders
- Company to call Mr Vaux as witness regarding dismissal and resignation circumstances
- Production of Mr Vaux's diary for September and October 2001 for Tribunal hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment