Khan v. Trident Safeguards Ltd & Ors [2001] UKEAT 1035_01_2210 (22 October 2001)

Khan v. Trident Safeguards Ltd & Ors [2001] UKEAT 1035_01_2210 (22 October 2001)

The Tribunal's decisions to refuse disclosure of the memo/letter and to allow redaction of tenderers' names were within its discretion, not perverse or unreasonable, and did not disadvantage the appellant; therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 1035_01_2210
Parties
Appellant: Mr Arfan Kahn; Respondent: Unknown Respondent(s)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 October 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Documents, Racial Discrimination, Interlocutory Appeal
Employment Law Disclosure of Documents Racial Discrimination Interlocutory Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Arfan Kahn

Appellant

Unknown Respondent(s)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in refusing disclosure of a memo/letter regarding tax deduction for Ms Omezi
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in ordering redaction of tenderers' names in documents disclosed to the appellant

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decisions to refuse disclosure of the memo/letter and to allow redaction of tenderers' names were within its discretion, not perverse or unreasonable, and did not disadvantage the appellant; therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed at preliminary stage; no full hearing to proceed