Ayovuare v. OCL Plastering (London) Ltd [2001] UKEAT 0677_01_1710 (17 October 2001)
The appeal was dismissed because the only point pursued was an attempt to challenge the Tribunal's finding of fact regarding witness credibility, which is within the Tribunal's discretion and not a matter for appeal unless perverse, which was not established here.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0677_01_1710
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Ayovuare; Respondent: OCL Plastering (London) Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Unlawful Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Ayovuare
Appellant
OCL Plastering (London) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding the Respondent's explanation for non-appointment adequate and satisfactory
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in finding Mr Occleshaw a credible witness despite inconsistencies in his evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the only point pursued was an attempt to challenge the Tribunal's finding of fact regarding witness credibility, which is within the Tribunal's discretion and not a matter for appeal unless perverse, which was not established here.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment