Banerji v. Navaneethan & Ors [2003] UKEAT 0640_03_2608 (26 August 2003)
No sufficient basis was provided to justify an extension of time for the appeal; the order complained of had already been complied with, rendering the appeal academic; no question of law arose from the Tribunal's case management orders.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0640_03_2608
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Banerji
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 August 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Registrar's Refusal to Register Out of Time Appeal; Applications Under Rule 3(10)
- Outcome
- Appeal and applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Case Management, Sequential Exchange of Witness Statements, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Banerji
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Registrar's Refusal to Register Out of Time Appeal; Applications Under Rule 3(10)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Registrar erred in refusing to register an appeal lodged 160 days out of time
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in ordering sequential exchange of witness statements
- 3 Whether any question of law arises from the Tribunal's case management orders
Ratio Decidendi
No sufficient basis was provided to justify an extension of time for the appeal; the order complained of had already been complied with, rendering the appeal academic; no question of law arose from the Tribunal's case management orders.
Court Disposition
Appeal and applications dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against Registrar's refusal to register out-of-time appeal dismissed
- Applications under Rule 3(10) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment