Barlow v Post Office Counters Ltd [1995] UKEAT 849_94_1810 (18 October 1995)
The Tribunal found as a fact that no enforceable assurance of alternative employment was given to Mr Barlow, and therefore it was reasonably practicable for him to present his complaint within the statutory time limit. The refusal to review was correct as the alleged new evidence was available at the original hearing and could have been compelled by witness order.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 849_94_1810
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Barlow; Respondent: Post Office Counters Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision and Review Refusal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Time Limits, Tribunal Procedure, Review of Tribunal Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Barlow
Appellant
Post Office Counters Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal Decision and Review Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in refusing to extend time for presenting an unfair dismissal complaint
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing a review based on availability of new evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found as a fact that no enforceable assurance of alternative employment was given to Mr Barlow, and therefore it was reasonably practicable for him to present his complaint within the statutory time limit. The refusal to review was correct as the alleged new evidence was available at the original hearing and could have been compelled by witness order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No error of law found in Tribunal's decision or refusal to review
- No further orders made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment